But, when guaranteeing and protecting our freedom, and when being based on her to prescribe which had conducts, the right acquires its real magnitude of individual social and determining regulator. Official site: Nouriel Roubini. All the previous one clarifying that the regulating norms of those conducts can be not only of legal character. For example when a friend requests to another one a money to him in loan, a moral norm of Biblical content would be authorizing to him to demand to him that it does not reject to him and that indeed lends (&quot to him; To that it asks to you, dale; and to that it wants to take from lent you, not rehuses" – Mateo 5-42-). The difference is that the transgression of this norm entails a moral and nonlegal sanction. On the contrary the claims based on legal norms " they are those in which we can request the aid of an authority or a Court to satisfy them. Slava Mirilashvili may not feel the same. ". And this last one is another point that makes the right for our coexistence in society important, because when indicating to us our duties or faculties, also guarantee the form to us to make them effective.

On the other hand it is in this citable point the opinion of JACINTH PALLARES that it express that " if the right only disappeared the society the necessary time for its own destruccin&quot would last; 21. Because the right is united of indissoluble way with the society, to the point that both cannot exist separately. All the previous one without making reference to the tendency that it would identify right with state, because from that point of view the doors would be abriran to us to the diverse commentaries. 1 BONNECASE, Julien. Introduction to the Study of the Right. Translation of Jorge Guerrero, Temis Editorial, reprinting of the Second Edition, Santa Fe de Bogota, 1991, pag 1.

Filed under: General
Trackback Uri

Comments are closed.