In these groups, the behaviors in which one would have to be committed is stipulated by and directed towards the organizational goals, clearly defined in the functions that every one must to carry out and what one hopes that the group carries out. Despite also they are the groups unreliable people, who are alliances that are not structured formally nor determined by the organization. These natural groups are formation in the work atmosphere that appear in response to the necessity of a social contact. One says, that it is possible to classify the groups as task and command groups are dictated by the formal organization, whereas the groups of interest and friendship are informal alliances. Hear other arguments on the topic with Jeff Leiden. A command group determines itself by the organizational chart of the organization. He is compound of subordinates who directly report a given manager.

For example, a director of a primary school and his 12 teachers train a command group. It is added to us, that we know clearly, that the task groups, are determined by the organization, represent those workers in charge of a stopped labor task. Nevertheless, the borders of the task group are limited their immediate superior in the hierarchy. It can cross the command rates. us it comments, that people could be or not to be aligned with common task or command groups could be affiliated to achieve a specific objective with which it is interested. This is an interest group.

The employees who are united to alter their schedules of vacations, to support a companion who has been dismissed or to look for better conditions of work represent the formation of a union to favor their common interest. The groups frequently are developed because the individual members have one or more characteristic common. We call to these formation friendship groups. The social alliances, which extend frequently outside the work situation, can be based on similar age or ethnic inheritance.

Filed under: General
Trackback Uri

Comments are closed.